Stormfields

Request for Any Robert Nisbet Correspondence

Nisbet LF

Dear Anyone,

I’m trying to collect any and all letters to and from Robert Nisbet (1913-1996). He wrote letters frequently, but no one has yet collected his correspondence except for the Library of Congress (which just has three boxes, mostly manuscripts of books).

If you have any extent correspondence to or from Nisbet and would be willing to copy or scan any or all of it for me, I would be extremely grateful.

If there are costs involved, just let me know.

Yours, thankfully, Brad

Please just email me at my gmail.com account: bradbirzer@

A Few Nice Nisbet Quotes

Nisbet LF

Robert Nisbet (1913-1996)

“Traditionalist we may choose to label Burke, but the fact is, few minds of stature have ever given more brilliant witness to rights, liberties and equities in the affairs of government”

“Insight into the nature of the totalitarian mind, complete with its passion for centralization and uniformity, for rationalist extirpation of tradition and prejudgment, and for an absolute moralism that would extend when necessary to terror was not so easily com by in the late 18th Century, and we owe Burke much for this first insight.”

–Robert Nisbet, “Burke’s Guide to Revolution,” Wall Street Journal (June 5, 1972), 12.

 

“Patriotism is indispensable to the American nation.  Nothing, however, corrupts and damages patriotism like war that is without relation to clear and compelling national interest.”

–Robert Nisbet, “War, Crisis, and Intellectuals,” Wall Street Journal (January 25, 1971), p. 10.

Ralph Hauenstein, RIP

Colonel-Ralph-HauensteinWhat a man.  I only had the privilege of meeting him a few times, but I thoroughly enjoyed his company.  And, he treated one of the men I respect most–Gleaves Whitney–with all due support and respect.  Thank you, Mr. Hauenstein.  A true western man.

http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2016/01/businessman_philanthropist_ral.html

Three Thoughts about Charles Carroll of Carrollton

ccc

ISI Books, 2010.

I was just asked by a group in France to describe three aspects of Charles Carroll of Carrollton’s thought and life.  Nice.  I’ve not given a lot of thought re: him for several years.  Kind of like visiting an old friend.

For what they’re worth, here are my three thoughts.

1.  Born a bastard (only because of anti-religious laws) to a wealthy Roman Catholic couple in Maryland, Charles Carroll and his cousin, John Carroll (later the first archbishop in the United States) , left Maryland for education at St. Omer while still young boys.  Charles, however, stayed in Europe for nearly two decades, before returning to the American colonies in 1765.  Because of Maryland law, Roman Catholics could not educate their children or raise their children in the Catholic Church.  To do so risked confiscation of the children by Protestants.  Additionally, Roman Catholics could not serve in politics or law (even as witnesses in crimes), but they could rather tenuously hold property.  Upon returning to Maryland in 1765, the now highly educated Charles began to involve himself in various clubs and societies in Maryland, eventually revealing his profound philosophical side in the famous 1773 debates regarding taxation and religious authority.  Charles emerged from these debates a republican patriot and hero.  As Maryland moved toward independence from Britain, 1774-1776, Charles emerged as its champion and the anti-Catholic laws faded quickly in revolution.
 
2.  Because of the insistence of his father and the education the Jesuits provided him at St. Omer, Charles was fiercely humane and liberal in his education.  He knew, for example, Cicero as well as he know Montesquieu, and he deeply admired both.  That is, he saw his current life not as a break from the past, but as an extension of it.  When he signed the American Declaration of Independence, he believed he was doing so as a representative of the liberally educated from Socrates to the present.  While Charles was extreme in this belief, he was not unique.  Most of American founding fathers had received an intense liberal education in Greek and Latin.
 
3.  Throughout his life, Charles remained a republican, but he was certainly not a democrat.  That is, he believed that the best free society worked when its members willingly gave of themselves to the common good.  When they began to focus only on their own advancement or rights, society decayed quickly.  As much as Charles liked Thomas Jefferson personally, he feared that Jefferson was simply too radical to lead the United States, and he feared that Jefferson’s passions would lead to the undoing of American liberty and republicanism.  Because Carroll lived to the age of 95, he had the privilege of being the last of the signers of the Declaration of Independence to pass away.  In the early 1830s, he even met the greatest of all analysts of American society, Alexis de Tocqueville, and served as one of the French writer’s main informants.  The two men had almost identical views of American democracy.  It was beautiful, but it was also quite fragile.
To order AMERICAN CICERO: http://isibooks.org/american-cicero.html

Ralph McInerny on Catholic Liberal Education

A wonderful quote for that twentieth-century gentleman of academia, Professor Ralph McInerny.

41MWKV0ZNHL._SX300_BO1,204,203,200_

Otto Bird reminds of us of a better time, when it was understood that the faith should animate imagination and mind as well as the corporal works of mercy. Indeed, what is peculiar to the Catholic university is precisely that in its halls intellectual and imaginative pursuits are seen in terms of the great journey mankind is on toward salvation. It is curiously true that the fact that this life is a mere prelude to the true life men are meant for hereafter, far from devaluing the things of this world, enhances them and casts over them a light they could not have otherwise.… Faith in Hope and Love do not make one disdainful of this world but rather, by seeing it as the stage on which one’s eternal condition will be settled, give it far profound or significance than it could have if ‘our little lives were rounded in a sleep.’

–Ralph McInerny, “Preface,” in Otto Bird, Seeking a Center: My Life as a Great Bookie (San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1991), 10.